A businessman is suing a jewellers’ after a £29,000 ‘fancy’ yellow diamond he gave his girlfriend for Christmas fell out of her ring in Victoria Station and was lost.
Olivia Claffey sparked a frantic treasure-hunt involving rail staff scouring the tracks for the gem after noticing it was missing from the setting of her £31,000 ring as she got off a train and into a taxi on March 4, 2018.
But the precious stone – which she was given as a lavish Christmas gift by then boyfriend Mark Hare – was never found.
Mr Hare, from Warninglid, West Sussex, is now suing the jewellers from whom he bought the ring and stone – Raymond Lloyd Ltd, trading as Philip Lloyd Jewellers.
He says the diamond was lost because one of the ‘claws’ of the setting holding the diamond in place on the ring snapped off.
His barrister, Andrew Spencer, told Central London County Court, ‘his case is that the ring setting was not of satisfactory quality, was not reasonably fit for the purpose of holding the diamond, and that the setting of the diamond into the ring setting was not undertaken with reasonable skill and care’.
Businessman Mark Hare, pictured outside Royal Courts of Justice, London, is suing over the loss of the £29k diamond. Right, Olivia Claffey (outside the Royal Courts of Justice), sparked a frantic treasure-hunt involving rail staff scouring the tracks for the gem after noticing it was missing from the setting of her £31,000 ring
Mr Hare is claiming the diamond’s market value, which he says the jewellers put at £56,950 – or at least the return of the £29,000 he paid for the rare stone.
But Philip Lloyd Jewellers are fighting the claim all the way, insisting that the ring setting was of good quality and blaming Ms Claffey’s ‘reckless use of jewellery’ for the loss of the stone.
Judge Nicholas Parfitt was told that Mr Hare had shelled out a total of £30,750 for a spectacular yellow stone diamond ring as a special gift for his then partner.
The 58-year-old insurance broker initially bought the stone for £29,000 from Philip Lloyd Jewellers in Reigate in December 2017, later returning with Ms Claffey in the New Year when she picked out a £1,750 ring setting for it.
After the jeweller arranged for the stone to be set, Ms Claffey collected her new ring in February 2018, but says she wore the sparkler only two or three times before catastrophically losing it at Victoria Station the following month.
Ms Claffey explained how the diamond disappeared from its ring setting during a day trip to London to see a friend.
She recalled looking at it on her finger and ‘admiring’ it while on the train.
But the first time she realised it was gone was when she glanced at the ring again as she got into a cab at Victoria and noticed to her horror it was missing.
In desperation, she started an exhaustive search for the diamond at Victoria, she told the court, spending four hours in a fruitless hunt which also involved train workers checking the track for the stone.
She finally called home to give her partner, Mr Hare, the bad news which she said was ‘the worst phone call I ever had to make’.
‘I was quite nervous because I had to say ‘by the way the £29,000 diamond you gave me for Christmas which at the time was the most beautiful and significant thing I’d ever been given was lost’,’ she added.
A court exhibited picture of the ring and the yellow stone diamond
The jewellers’ barrister, Sally Anne Blackmore, highlighted expert evidence suggesting that ‘the diamond was lost as a result of heavy wear and lack of care by the wearer’.
The same expert decided that ‘the most likely cause of the failure of the ring setting was wearing and taking off a glove while wearing the ring’, she explained.
Ms Blackmore suggested Ms Claffey had been nervous about telling Mr Hare because she had a record for ‘reckless use of jewellery’ and ‘was frightened because she thought he would be very angry that she had damaged another piece’.
Mr Hare said he had been a long-standing client of Philip Lloyd Jewellers before the diamond disaster, and acknowledged he had always received ‘excellent’ service in the past.
He approached the jewellers in December 2017 and asked if they could ‘source a fancy yellow diamond’ which he then gave Ms Claffey for Christmas.
Even after she collected the complete diamond ring in February 2018, Ms Claffey only wore it ‘on special occasions only,’ he told the court.
He only remembered her wearing the ring three times, he added, including on a trip to the Metropole Hotel in Brighton and on the day of its disappearance.
Asked by Ms Blackmore whether his ex had a habit of neglecting her jewellery, he replied: ‘She is not hard on her jewellery, I don’t consider her any better or worse than any other young lady.’
Mr Hare’s barrister argued that the claw holding the ring in place failed due to a simple defect in the ring, rejecting suggestions that Ms Claffey caused the damage by neglecting her jewel.
‘The only options are misuse or a defective ring. I submit that on Ms Claffey’s evidence misuse is completely ruled out,’ he told the judge.
Judge Parfitt has now reserved his ruling in the case to be given at a later date.